Artificial intelligence · Guide
How to Spot Deepfakes and AI-Generated Images: A Step-by-Step Guide
Published:
In brief
Identifying a deepfake or AI-generated image reliably requires combining visual checks, provenance tools such as Content Credentials or SynthID, and reverse-image search — no single method catches every fake. Detection researchers warn that automated tools can be fooled by simple edits like cropping or compression, so context verification remains essential.
There is no single tool that catches every deepfake or AI-generated image. Cybersecurity firm ESET and the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at the University of Oxford both recommend layering several checks — visual inspection, provenance metadata, watermark detection and source verification — because each method has known blind spots.
Step 1: Look for visual and audio inconsistencies
ESET's guide to spotting AI-generated misinformation lists concrete visual clues to check first: unnatural lighting, overly smooth skin textures, flickering edges and blurred backgrounds. Facial anomalies worth checking include misaligned eyes, distorted teeth and unusual blinking patterns. For video, a mismatch between the audio and the speaker's lip movements is a common sign of manipulation, according to ESET.
ESET also notes that tools used to create deepfakes often alter or erase a file's creation and modification dates, so inconsistent metadata can be a secondary clue.
Step 2: Check for Content Credentials (C2PA)
Content Credentials, built on the C2PA technical standard, record information about an image at the moment it is created by cryptographically signing it, according to the Content Authenticity Initiative (CAI). The CAI describes this record as a kind of nutrition label for digital content, showing the creator, the software or AI tool used, and whether the file was generated or edited with AI, when that information was included by the creator.
The CAI is explicit that Content Credentials are not meant to declare whether content is "real": they provide context about origin, not a verdict. The system also only works if the creating tool actually embeds a manifest.
Step 3: Check for an invisible watermark, such as SynthID
Google's SynthID embeds an imperceptible digital watermark directly into the pixels of images generated by its Imagen model, according to Google DeepMind. A separate detection model scans an image for that pattern and reports one of three results: watermark detected (likely AI-generated), not detected (unlikely AI-generated), or possibly detected, in which case DeepMind recommends treating the result with caution.
DeepMind says the SynthID watermark is designed to survive common edits such as filtering, color adjustment, rotation and JPEG compression. However, it only flags images that were watermarked at creation by Imagen or partner tools that use SynthID — an image from a model that does not use SynthID will return a "not detected" result even if it is AI-generated, DeepMind's documentation shows.
Step 4: Run a reverse image search
Reverse image search tools such as Google Lens or TinEye can reveal whether an image circulated previously in a different context, which is one of the most reliable ways to catch recycled or relabeled visuals, researchers at the Reuters Institute note. If the same picture appears attached to an older, unrelated story, that is a strong signal the current claim about it is false, independent of whether the image itself was AI-generated.
Why automated detectors can still be fooled
The Reuters Institute's review of AI detection tools found that simple edits routinely defeat them. When researchers cropped and scaled a viral image purporting to show a Pentagon explosion, detection software classified the altered version as authentic. Lowering resolution and trimming a well-known Obama deepfake video produced similar false negatives, and social-media compression of an AI-generated Biden robocall caused one detector to call a copy "highly likely real," while the original uncompressed file scored 74% likely to be fake.
The review also found that detectors trained mainly on well-known public figures, such as a head of state, performed worse on lesser-known individuals with little online presence, because the underlying models had less verified reference data to compare against.
Putting it together
- Inspect the image or video for the visual and audio inconsistencies ESET lists, such as unnatural lighting, blinking patterns or lip-sync mismatches.
- Check whether the file carries Content Credentials (C2PA) metadata disclosing AI generation.
- If the image may come from a Google model, check it with Google's SynthID detector for a watermark result.
- Run a reverse image search with Google Lens or TinEye to see whether the image has appeared elsewhere in a different context.
- Treat any single result as inconclusive on its own, and compare the claim against coverage from established news organizations before sharing it, as the Reuters Institute and ESET both advise.
Computational detection tools could be a great starting point as part of a verification process, along with other open-source techniques.
Questions
- Can a single app or website reliably tell me if an image is a deepfake?
- No. ESET and the Reuters Institute both report that individual detection tools can be defeated by simple edits like cropping, resizing or compression, so results from any one tool should be treated as a starting point, not a final answer.
- What is the difference between Content Credentials and SynthID?
- Content Credentials (C2PA) are metadata a creation tool voluntarily attaches declaring how a file was made; SynthID is an invisible pixel-level watermark embedded by Google's Imagen model and checked with a separate detector. Both can be absent even on genuinely AI-generated images if the creating tool doesn't support them or the metadata is stripped.
- Why do deepfake detectors sometimes say a real AI image is authentic?
- The Reuters Institute found that edits such as cropping, lowering resolution, or recompressing a file for social media can push a detector's score toward "authentic" even when the underlying content is AI-generated or manipulated.
- What visual signs should I look for first in a suspected deepfake video?
- ESET recommends checking lighting consistency, skin texture, eye alignment, blinking patterns, and whether the audio matches the speaker's lip movements.
- Does reverse image search detect AI generation?
- Not directly — it detects whether an image has appeared online before in a different context, which the Reuters Institute notes is useful for catching recycled real photos being falsely described, separate from detecting AI generation itself.
Sources
- ESET — How to detect deepfakes: A practical guide to spotting AI-generated misinformation
- Content Authenticity Initiative — How it works (Content Credentials)
- Reuters Institute, University of Oxford — Spotting the deepfakes in this year of elections: how AI detection tools work and where they fail
- Google DeepMind — Identifying AI-generated images with SynthID
This piece was prepared with artificial intelligence and passed an automated source check before publication. If you see an error, ask for a correction. Request a correction or reply · How we make this
Related

Artificial intelligenceArticle
How AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Claude actually work, explained
AI chatbots are built on large language models (LLMs), neural networks trained to predict the next "token" in a sequence of text. They turn words into numbers, use an attention mechanism to weigh how words relate to each other, and are then fine-tuned with human feedback to behave like helpful assistants rather than raw text predictors.
Artificial intelligenceArticle
How AI Recommendation Algorithms Decide What You See and Buy Online
AI recommendation systems personalize feeds and product suggestions by analyzing what users click, watch, rate and buy, then matching that behavior against patterns from similar users. Platforms such as Netflix, YouTube and Amazon say they use engagement and contextual signals — not, in some cases, demographic data — while regulators in the US and EU have raised concerns about transparency and data collection behind these systems.
Artificial intelligenceArticle
Why AI Language Models Hallucinate: The Research Behind False Answers
AI "hallucinations" happen because language models are trained to predict the next plausible word, not to verify truth, and because the tests used to grade them reward confident guessing over admitting uncertainty. OpenAI researchers argue the problem is partly a mathematical consequence of how models are trained and partly a result of how the AI industry scores them.

Artificial intelligenceArticle
Demis Hassabis Now Says AGI Could Arrive Within Two to Three Years
Google DeepMind's Demis Hassabis told WSJ Magazine he now expects artificial general intelligence (AGI) within two to three years, down from the three-to-five-year window he cited earlier in 2026. He defines AGI through an "Einstein test" and says his estimate keeps shifting closer to the present.