Economy · Article
Ofgem's proposed switching charge: how it would work and what it means for bills
Published:
In brief
Ofgem, Great Britain's energy regulator, is consulting on reactivating a market stabilisation charge that would make a supplier pay a rival 85% of any drop in wholesale prices below a 10% threshold when it wins that rival's customer. Ofgem says the charge would not automatically raise bills, but consumer campaigner Martin Lewis has argued it works as a switching penalty that would shrink the savings on offer from cheaper deals.
On 16 October 2026, Ofgem opened a consultation on whether to reactivate the market stabilisation charge (MSC), a mechanism under which a supplier that gains a customer by offering a cheaper deal would have to compensate the supplier that loses that customer, but only when wholesale energy prices fall sharply.
How the mechanism would work
Under the proposal, the charge would be triggered once wholesale prices fall more than 10% below the level built into the regulator's price cap. Once that threshold is crossed, a supplier that attracts a customer with a cheaper tariff would have to pay the losing supplier 85% of the difference between the wholesale price and the threshold, according to the consultation.
Why Ofgem is acting now
Neil Kenward, Ofgem's interim director general of markets, said the regulator was preparing for a winter that is expected to be difficult for many households. The energy price cap rose 4% from 1 October 2026, and some forecasts cited in coverage of the announcement point to a further increase in average bills by January 2027.
Ofgem argues suppliers can be left financially exposed when they have bought energy in advance for existing customers at a higher price, only for wholesale prices to then fall and rivals to undercut them with new, cheaper offers built on the lower price. The regulator says the charge is meant to stop that exposure from pushing suppliers towards insolvency.
What happened the last time the charge was used
The MSC is not new. Ofgem first introduced it in February 2022, at the start of the energy crisis triggered by Russia's invasion of Ukraine, saying the charge was meant to stop suppliers that had already bought energy in advance from being penalised, while still allowing switching customers to benefit from cheaper tariffs. The charge then operated from April 2022 until March 2024, a period in which more than 30 energy suppliers in Great Britain collapsed.
| 2022–2024 version | 2026 proposal |
|---|---|
| Status | Active, introduced Feb 2022 |
| Trigger | Wholesale price fall, threshold adjusted over time |
| Compensation owed | Set by Ofgem's published weekly methodology |
| Stated reason | Russia-Ukraine energy crisis, wave of supplier failures |
Does it mean higher bills for switchers?
Ofgem says reactivating the charge would not automatically lead to increased costs for consumers, because payments between suppliers are only triggered if wholesale prices fall sharply enough, and the charge does not apply to the regulated price cap itself.
Martin Lewis, founder of MoneySavingExpert.com, has disputed that the measure is cost-free for consumers. He said that if wholesale prices drop sharply, cheap fixed-rate deals and switching offers would become noticeably more expensive, because a new supplier would have to pass part of its savings to the customer's previous supplier rather than passing all of it on in a lower price.
That's because any firm taking on a new customer, including on a cheap fix or other specialist tariff, will have to pay compensation to that customer's old supplier, if they switch. It's basically a form of switching penalty.
Lewis has also argued the current market differs from 2022, when the charge was first justified by a wave of supplier collapses; he says suppliers are currently more financially stable, making the case for the charge less clear-cut.
What happens next
Ofgem's consultation, open to domestic suppliers, price comparison sites and consumer groups, is seeking views on the trigger threshold, notice periods before the charge takes effect, and arrangements for switching the charge off again. The consultation is due to close on 29 October 2026, after which Ofgem is expected to decide whether, and in what form, to reactivate the charge before winter.
Questions
- What is Ofgem's market stabilisation charge?
- It is a payment one energy supplier would owe a rival when it gains that rival's customer through a cheaper deal, but only if wholesale energy prices have fallen sharply. Ofgem is consulting on reactivating it from October 2026.
- Will the charge automatically raise my energy bill?
- Ofgem says it would not, because the charge is paid between suppliers and only applies once wholesale prices fall more than 10% below the price-cap level; it does not change the regulated price cap itself.
- How much would a supplier have to pay under the proposal?
- Under the proposed design, a supplier winning a customer with a cheaper deal would pay the losing supplier 85% of the wholesale price drop beyond the 10% trigger threshold.
- Has this charge existed before?
- Yes. Ofgem first introduced the market stabilisation charge in February 2022 during the energy crisis following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and it ran until March 2024, a period in which more than 30 suppliers failed.
- What does Martin Lewis say about the proposal?
- Martin Lewis of MoneySavingExpert.com has called it a form of switching penalty, arguing it would reduce how much of a wholesale price fall a new supplier can pass on to a switching customer.
Sources
- Ofgem — Update on stabilising the energy market
- energynews.pro — Ofgem Proposes Activating the Market Stabilisation Charge for Energy Suppliers
- SSBCrack News — Ofgem Proposes Market Stabilisation Charge to Protect Energy Suppliers Amid Price Volatility
- Global Banking & Finance — UK Watchdog Acts to Shield Energy Market from Price Swings
- Brit Brief — Martin Lewis warns Ofgem's plan is a 'switching penalty' as energy bills rise
This piece was prepared with artificial intelligence and passed an automated source check before publication. If you see an error, ask for a correction. Request a correction or reply · How we make this
Related
EconomyNews
Brent Crude Oil Touches $110 as Middle East Violence Outweighs Supply Moves
Brent crude jumped to as high as $110 a barrel on October 16, 2026, up roughly 3%, after a Houthi missile attack on Yemen's presidential palace in Aden and intensified Iranian attacks on shipping near the Strait of Hormuz. Prices had fallen below $106 earlier the same day as the International Energy Agency released emergency reserves and Washington weighed easing some sanctions.
EconomyNews
ISTAT: Italy's Underground and Illegal Economy Reached €218.2bn in 2024
Italy's national statistics agency ISTAT reports that undeclared economic activity and illegal markets together generated €218.2 billion in 2024, equal to 9.9% of GDP. The underground economy grew to €198.4 billion while irregular labor rose 4.6%, outpacing growth in regular employment.
EconomyNews
EU top court: banks must refund fraud victims first, even if negligent
The EU Court of Justice ruled on 15 October 2026 that banks must refund victims of unauthorised payment fraud immediately — even when the bank believes the customer was grossly negligent, for example by falling for a phishing link. Banks can still try to recover the money afterwards, but only by proving negligence themselves, usually in court.

EconomyArticle
How Economists Forecast Inflation and Currency Values — and Why They Often Miss
Economists forecast inflation using price-index data, statistical "signal extraction" models, and surveys of households and professional forecasters, while currency forecasts typically rely on theories like purchasing power parity alongside statistical models. Both exercises carry well-documented limits: inflation models struggle during sudden regime shifts, and most exchange-rate models still cannot reliably beat a simple "no-change" guess over short and medium horizons.